Forgetting Baudrillard: Predialectic objectivism and the subdialectic
paradigm of consensus
R. Paul Wilson
Department of Politics, University of Illinois
Henry Geoffrey
Department of Future Studies, Stanford University
1. Constructivist neocapitalist theory and textual dematerialism
“Society is fundamentally dead,” says Sartre. Lacan uses the term
’subcultural materialist theory’ to denote not narrative, but postnarrative.
However, Foucault suggests the use of textual dematerialism to attack
hierarchy. In The Island of the Day Before, Eco deconstructs precultural
theory; in The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas, however, he examines the
subdialectic paradigm of consensus.
In a sense, Derrida promotes the use of the textual paradigm of reality to
deconstruct sexual identity. The characteristic theme of the works of Eco is
the collapse, and eventually the futility, of subsemioticist society.
2. Expressions of failure
In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the concept of textual
language. Therefore, Debord suggests the use of predialectic objectivism to
attack class divisions. Werther[1] suggests that we have to
choose between textual dematerialism and neocultural material theory.
If one examines predialectic objectivism, one is faced with a choice: either
reject the posttextual paradigm of reality or conclude that narrativity is
capable of significance. However, Sontag promotes the use of the subdialectic
paradigm of consensus to read and deconstruct art. The main theme of Brophy’s[2] model of predialectic objectivism is a self-supporting
reality.
In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the distinction between
within and without. Therefore, Bataille uses the term ‘textual dematerialism’
to denote the role of the participant as observer. Derrida suggests the use of
predialectic objectivism to attack elitist perceptions of society.
“Culture is part of the dialectic of consciousness,” says Foucault. However,
Lyotard uses the term ‘textual dematerialism’ to denote the defining
characteristic of capitalist class. Predialectic objectivism holds that the
establishment is meaningless.
Thus, an abundance of destructuralisms concerning subsemanticist materialism
exist. The without/within distinction intrinsic to Burroughs’s Queer
emerges again in The Soft Machine, although in a more mythopoetical
sense.
But if textual dematerialism holds, we have to choose between capitalist
capitalism and Lacanist obscurity. Marx uses the term ‘predialectic
objectivism’ to denote not desituationism per se, but predesituationism.
In a sense, in Junky, Burroughs affirms the subdialectic paradigm of
consensus; in Queer, although, he denies textual dematerialism. Prinn[3] suggests that we have to choose between predialectic
objectivism and the cultural paradigm of context.
It could be said that the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is the
difference between sexual identity and society. Sontag’s critique of textual
dematerialism holds that truth is capable of truth, but only if the premise of
predialectic objectivism is valid; otherwise, Sartre’s model of textual
dematerialism is one of “neoconstructivist discourse”, and hence intrinsically
unattainable.
However, the subject is contextualised into a predialectic objectivism that
includes sexuality as a totality. Marx promotes the use of modern posttextual
theory to analyse sexual identity.
Therefore, if predialectic objectivism holds, we have to choose between the
subdialectic paradigm of consensus and dialectic Marxism. The characteristic
theme of Scuglia’s[4] essay on deconstructive postdialectic
theory is a self-referential whole.
1. Werther, C. Z. Y. (1985)
Predialectic objectivism in the works of Burroughs. Panic Button
Books
2. Brophy, N. E. ed. (1970) The Genre of Class: The
subdialectic paradigm of consensus in the works of Eco. Cambridge
University Press
3. Prinn, L. (1991) The subdialectic paradigm of consensus
and predialectic objectivism. And/Or Press
4. Scuglia, Y. C. ed. (1974) The Failure of Expression:
Predialectic objectivism and the subdialectic paradigm of consensus. Oxford
University Press
The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).
This installation of the Generator has delivered 2120283 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational. It is being served from a machine in Seattle, Washington, USA.
More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks”. An on-line copy is available from Monash University.
If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.
Publicerad med anledning av en helt fantastisk bloggidé av Thebe.
